The sustainable investor for a changing world

Oil refinery aerial view
Front of mind | Article - 7 Min

The renminbi’s creeping internationalisation

China has recently revived talks with Saudi Arabia on settling some oil trades in renminbi in a move that many market players see as a first step towards gradually shifting the global oil trade to the renminbi from the US dollar, creating the ‘petro-yuan’.  

Meanwhile, the Russo-Ukrainian crisis has raised the possibility of Russia trading oil with China using the renminbi instead of USD.

If Saudi Arabia and Russia were to work with China, the amount of renminbi-denominated oil trades could rise sharply and transactions could go through China’s payments system, the Cross-border Interbank Payments System (CIPS), at the expense of the dollar and the SWIFT system.

This would be a serious challenge to the US dollar system as, arguably, the dollar’s global reserve currency status is largely based on its importance in the energy and commodity markets.

Linchpin of dollar supremacy

One of the staples of the past four decades, and an anchor sustaining the dollar’s worldwide status, was a global financial system based on the petro-dollar. This was a world in which oil producers would sell their products to the US and the rest of the world for dollars. They would recycle the proceeds into USD assets by investing in dollar-bloc markets, propping up the dollar as the world’s reserve currency.

This has made the oil market, and by extension the global commodity market, a linchpin for sustaining the US as the world’s undisputed financial superpower. If that linchpin were to fall away, the dollar’s status would start to crumble.

Saudi acceptance of renminbi for oil could help chip away at the supremacy of the dollar. The question is whether Saudi Arabia would want to do that when it is also a major US ally.

Arguably, Saudi Arabia has an incentive to get closer to China. It has become increasingly unhappy with US security commitments to defend the kingdom, as the Wall Street Journal reported recently. Meanwhile, China has strengthened its relationship with Saudi Arabia in recent years by increasing investment in, and military cooperation with, the kingdom. [1]

One way for Saudi Arabia to balance its interests between China and the US would be to trade oil with China (and probably also with Asia) in renminbi using CIPS, while trading oil with the rest of the world in dollars via SWIFT.

The petro-yuan’s threat

How big a threat will the petro-yuan be to the dollar-based payments system? It is impossible to give an accurate answer at this stage as it will take time for the petro-yuan oil talks to conclude. We may glean clues from public information on the relationships and oil trades between China and other major producers.

Some market players initially estimated that switching the oil trade from the dollar to the renminbi could move USD 600 billion to USD 1 trillion worth of transactions out of the dollar a month. [2]

Let us take the mid-point of USD 800 billion. Now consider the SWIFT data on global payments currencies. In February 2022 (the latest data available at the time of writing), the renminbi was ranked the fifth most-widely-used currency for global payments, accounting for 2.23% of the total (Exhibit 1).

Since about USD 5 trillion worth of payment messages moves through SWIFT worldwide every day, or USD 100 trillion a month (based on an average of 20 working days per month), the renminbi’s 2.23% would amount to about USD 2.23 trillion a month.

If we add the USD 800 billion of oil trade that would be settled in renminbi, the yuan’s share of global payments would rise to a little over 3% in the SWIFT system. Although this would be an increase of 0.8 percentage points only, the RMB would displace the Japanese yen and become the fourth most-widely-used global currency.

The impact on CIPS would be more dramatic. According to the CIPS website, the system processed about USD 61 billion worth of payment messages a day in February, or USD 12.2 trillion a month. Adding USD 800 billion would boost the volume by almost 7% to USD 13 trillion a month.

However, it could go further. If Saudi Arabia and Russia start to use renminbi for oil trades, other countries would likely follow. At this point, Russia, Iran, Venezuela and Indonesia are already settling some of their oil trades with China in renminbi. The volume, and the scope of using renminbi for international payments, could grow as more countries diversify out of US dollar risk.

USD hegemony – A case of slow erosion

Of course, no one expects the petro-yuan to displace the petro-dollar and the dollar-based payments system anytime soon. There are strong reasons to expect the renminbi’s challenge to the US dollar hegemony to be a drawn-out process.

To make the renminbi attractive for payments, China will need to liberalise its financial markets and its capital account. This means allowing foreigners to trade Chinese assets without capital or bureaucratic controls. 

The pace of liberalisation has been slow. Given China’s large debt overhang (with the debt-to-GDP ratio estimated at 284% in 2021), liberalising its capital account quickly would risk a debt-currency crisis pulling the rug from under the Chinese system.

A major obstacle is that several major oil and gas producers in the Middle East have currencies pegged to the US dollar, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Oman, and Qatar. Kuwait’s currency is pegged to a basket of currencies dominated by the dollar. These pegs acted as a stability anchor for these countries when the US was the world’s largest oil importer.

With China replacing the US as the world’s largest oil importer, it is challenging the sustainability of these pegs. Inertia could keep them intact for a long time, especially when paying for oil in renminbi – or any currency other than the dollar – raises a foreign exchange risk that these countries have not faced in decades.

Moreover, despite years of financial reforms, China still does not have a large derivatives market to provide sufficient tools for hedging renminbi exchange risk.

Ultimately, China needs to establish the renminbi’s global credibility for it to gain acceptance. However, it appears that China’s disruption of the future global payments system is likely an emerging reality even before the renminbi becomes a global currency.


[1] “As Saudi Arabia Cools on the U.S., It Warms to China.” The Wall Street Journal Podcast, 17 March 2022, full transcript retrieved from

[2] “The Petro-yuan: A Momentous Game Changer for the Global Energy Markets, the Global Economy and Sanctions.” IAEE Energy Forum, Third Quarter, pp.29 – pp.33. Retrieved from and “China Will ‘Compel’ Saudi Arabia to Trade Oil in Yuan — And That’s Going to Affect the US Dollar.” CNBC, 11 October 2017. Retrieved from–and-thats-going-to-affect-the-us-dollar.html


This material is issued and has been prepared by BNP PARIBAS ASSET MANAGEMENT Asia Limited (the “Company”), with its registered office at 17/F, Lincoln House, Taikoo Place, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong. BNP PARIBAS ASSET MANAGEMENT Asia Limited in Australia is an authorised representative of BNP PARIBAS ASSET MANAGEMENT Australia Limited ABN 78 008 576 449, AFSL 223418 (“BNPP AMAU”). This material is distributed in Australia by BNPP AMAU. This material has not been reviewed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission. This material is produced for information purposes for wholesale investors only and does not constitute:
1. an offer to buy nor a solicitation to sell, nor shall it form the basis of or be relied upon in connection with any contract or commitment whatsoever or
2. investment advice.
This material makes reference to certain financial instruments authorised and regulated in their jurisdiction(s) of incorporation.
No action has been taken which would permit the public offering of the financial instrument(s) in any other jurisdiction, except as indicated in the most recent prospectus, offering document or any other information material, as applicable of the relevant financial instrument(s) where such action would be required, in particular, in the United States, to US persons (as such term is defined in Regulation S of the United States Securities Act of 1933). Prior to any subscription in a country in which such financial instrument(s) is/are registered, investors should verify any legal constraints or restrictions there may be in connection with the subscription, purchase, possession or sale of the financial instrument(s).
Investors considering subscribing to the financial instrument(s) should read carefully the most recent prospectus, offering document or other information material for further details including the risk factors and consult the financial instrument(s’) most recent financial reports. These documents are available from your local BNPP AM correspondents, if any, or from the entities marketing the Financial Instrument(s).
Opinions included in this material constitute the judgement of the Company at the time specified and may be subject to change without notice. The Company is not obliged to update or alter the information or opinions contained within this material. Investors should consult their own legal and tax advisors in respect of legal, accounting, domicile and tax advice prior to investing in the financial instrument(s) in order to make an independent determination of the suitability and consequences of an investment therein, if permitted. Please note that different types of investments, if contained within this material, involve varying degrees of risk and there can be no assurance that any specific investment may either be suitable, appropriate or profitable for an investor’s investment portfolio.
Investments involve risks. Given the economic and market risks, there can be no assurance that the financial instrument(s) will achieve its/their investment objectives. Returns may be affected by, amongst other things, investment strategies or objectives of the financial instrument(s) and material market and economic conditions, including interest rates, market terms and general market conditions. The different strategies applied to financial instruments may have a significant effect on the results presented in this material. Past performance is not a guide to future performance and the value of the investments in financial instrument(s) may go down as well as up. Investors may not get back the amount they originally invested.
The performance data, as applicable, reflected in this material, do not take into account the commissions, costs incurred on the issue and redemption and taxes.
All information referred to in the present document is available on

Related insights

14:46 MIN
Market weekly – Chinese equities – ahead of the curve
chi loDaniel Morris
2 Authors - Front of mind
27/04/2020 · 1 Min
Emerging market equities – reasons to expect another turning point
To access insights from our teams worldwide visit:
Explore VIEWPOINT today